
Monday, August 9, 2010
Tired of people "catching" me "sneak" sugar/candy at the office...
Monday, June 21, 2010
Today is National Aboriginal Day
That's is just the surface of differences, but I think it is enough that you can see the two views, although both concerned with wellbeing, come to this understanding with very different concepts of what is worthy of focus. (If you wish to read more, I think that the First Nations Regional Longitudinal Health Survey: The People's Report has a nicely illustrated outline that goes through the differences and similarities of First Nations and Western understandings of health.)As you can imagine, study after study illustrates that misunderstandings and racism are commonplace in Aboriginal peoples encounters with mainstream health services. I don't think it takes a genious to see that if Western medicine only considers the disease, than it is ill equipped to understand the various cultural and racial issues at play in these encounters. Take for example Catherine T. Elliott's narrative:
When I was a medical student, one of my teachers warned me to be wary of misunderstandings that could cloud my judgment. He described a case in which the powerful negative image of “drunken Indian” impaired a physician’s ability to assess and treat a man with diabetic ketoacidosis. The aboriginal patient waited in a wheelchair in the waiting room for several hours until the next physician came on shift and discovered the error.
While, she goes on to note:
In medical school, one of the first “facts” learned about Canada’s aboriginal peoples is that they have poor health status and experience substandard social and economic conditions. Many of us do not come to understand the historical and social contexts of these facts. This can lead to a sense that “being aboriginal” means having poor health and social conditions. This belief might leave us vulnerable to adopting common social stereotypes.
The practice of conflating health outcomes with cultural norms, when they are better explained by social, political, and economic factors, has a long history in Canada. It can occur when members of one group become marginalized and impoverished, and their behaviour in response to the marginalization is deemed “part of their culture.” For example, in the early 1900s when First Nations in British Columbia were separated from their land and resources, their ways of life changed from migratory to sedentary. Previously healthy living conditions became unsanitary, and high mortality rates from infectious disease ensued. The historical record suggests that First Nations themselves were blamed for their poor health, without an appreciation of the social effects of this dramatic change in way of life. Poor health was deemed “an inherent part of indigenous lifestyles.”
These last points, I think, are especially pertinent to diabetes. With colonization came the stress of displacement, genocide and residential schools (also see: Where are the children?) and a shift from traditional diets to Western foods- processed, rich in carbohydrates and fats. Diabetes, in this case, is not just an illness of the body, but also one of colonization... but is also now one of epidemic proportions in Native communities.
Consider these research findings:
"Diabetes among the non-reserve Aboriginal population was most prevalent in the North American Indian population, where 8.3% of the population age 15 and over was diagnosed with diabetes, as opposed to 6% of the Métis population and 2.3% of the Inuit population.
Rates of diabetes have risen for North American Indian adults not living on reserve since 1991 when the rate was 5.3%. Rates for the Métis and Inuit changed only slightly: 5.5% for Métis and 1.9% for Inuit adults in 1991.
According to Health Canada, there is evidence that the prevalence of diabetes is higher among the Aboriginal population living on-reserve. (Health Canada 2000) If this group were included, it is likely that the rate of diabetes for the total Aboriginal population (both those living in reserve and non-reserve areas combined) would be higher than 7%." (StatsCan)
More recent statistics note the prevalence of diabetes in First Nations adults is closer to 14.5%. While "among First Nations adults with diabetes, 78.2% have Type 2 diabetes, 9.9% have Type 1 diabetes and 9.8% are in the pre-diabetic stage." (RHS: The People's Report)
The average age of First Nations youth diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes is now 11 years. (RHS: The People's Report)
In research conducted between 1980-2005: "The prevalence of diabetes increased over the study period from 9.5% to 20.3% among First Nations women and from 4.9% to 16.0% among First Nations men. Among non-First Nations people, the prevalence increased from 2.0% to 5.5% among women and from 2.0% to 6.2% among men. By 2005, almost 50% of First Nations women and more than 40% of First Nations men aged 60 or older had diabetes, compared with less than 25% of non-First Nations men and less than 20% of non-First Nations women aged 80 or older." (Dyck, Osgood, Lin, Gao, & Stang in Canadian Medical Association Journal)
"In addition to high rates, according to Health Canada, diabetes is a significant concern for the Aboriginal population because of 'early onset, greater severity at diagnosis, high rates of complications, lack of accessible services, increasing trends, and increasing prevalence of risk factors for a population already at risk.' (Health Canada 2000)." (StatsCan)
Below, I have embedded a National Film Board of Canada short-film by Brion Whitford, an Ojibway man living with Type 2 diabetes. The piece follows Brion as he learns to deal with his diabetes by learning about his heritage. For various reasons, the film is sometimes hard to watch, but I think the lessons described and put forth are quite honest and touching.
(PLEASE NOTE: some of the scenes can be difficult to watch, especially if you or a loved one has diabetes and/or experienced colonial traumas. The film starts with Brion losing kidney function and having problems with circulation, in addition to struggling to find balance and health with diabetes. Also, there is one discussion where a man talks about losing his mother to diabetes and it is somewhat graphic... Just thought I should mention...)
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Excuse me, but your ego is in the way of my good health...
The piece was about type 1 diabetes and physician-patient relationships. It started off really good- talking about real-life comments from diabetes patients about their frustrations with healthcare providers. I thought, perhaps naively, that the speaker was heading into a conversation about some of the misconceptions held by many healthcare providers around issues of diabetes... No. Instead the ENTIRE discussion focused on findings of the DAWN Study around the psychosocial issues people with diabetes face. It was like he was talking to a room full of 'healthy' people... like all of us diabetic people were invisible in the room.
So, when the talk finished I dutifully put my hand up in the air to challenge what he was saying... "I've had diabetes for almost 16 years. I've never had an A1C above a 7. But I still get doctors that treat me like I'm clueless and I've had physicians that have called me a liar to my face," I said "Considering, then, why did you choose to leave out healthcare professionals in your analysis?"
The speaker kind of bumbled for a minute, but finally admitted to two things:
1. The traditional teachings around medical practice preached lecturing patients about all of the frightening possible complications of diabetes as a model of gaining patient compliance;
2. Umm... actually changing bad physician behaviours is probably even harder than changing negative patient behaviours.
I felt kind of sheepish about my question on several counts. First, I don't like talking about my diabetes control. I worry sometimes that people think I am doing something magical to keep my blood sugars in check, when the truth of it is that I sometimes I've just been really lucky in controlling the condition. But, then, I felt even more awkward after all the presentations when people I'd never met came up to me to comment that they too were feeling frustrated by the speakers talk.
As I left the conference I tried to hold on to the general feelings of contentment around the presentations and the positive people of the day, but I couldn't rid myself of the nagging sense of anger rheuminating in the back of my mind at the fact that a lone physician managed to silence an entire auditorium full of diabetes patients. Not nice, doc, not nice at all.